Lymantria mathura (pink gypsy moth)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Lymantria mathura Moore
- Preferred Common Name
- pink gypsy moth
- International Common Names
- Englishrosy gypsy mothrussian gypsy mothsal defoliator
- Spanishpolilla rosada
- Frenchspongieuse rose
- EPPO code
- LYMAMA (Lymantria mathura)
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Host status | References |
---|---|---|
Abies (firs) | Other | |
Acrocarpus fraxinifolius (shingle tree) | Unknown | Roonwal et al. (1962) |
Castanea (chestnuts) | Main | Lee and Lee (1996) |
Castanea mollissima (hairy chestnut) | Main | |
Distylium racemosum (isu) | Unknown | Yamazaki and Sugiura (2004) |
Larix (larches) | Other | |
Liquidambar formosana (beautiful sweetgum) | Main | |
Litchi chinensis (lichi) | Main | |
Mangifera indica (mango) | Main | Gajendra (1989) |
Neolamarckia cadamba (common bur-flower tree) | Main | |
Pinus (pines) | Other | Lee and Lee (1996) |
Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir) | Other | |
Quercus (oaks) | Unknown | Lee and Lee (1996) |
Quercus dentata (daimyo oak) | Unknown | Shibata et al. (2001) |
Quercus leucotrichophora (banj oak) | Main | |
Quercus mongolica (Mongolian oak) | Main | |
Quercus serrata (glandbearing oak) | Main | |
Shorea robusta (sal) | Main | |
Syzygium cumini (black plum) | Main | |
Terminalia arjuna (arjun) | Main | Mukesh et al. (2013) |
Terminalia myriocarpa | Main |
Symptoms
Symptoms of attack include the defoliation of flowers and leaves of host plants (Pucat and Watler, 1997) and the presence of insect life stages. During outbreaks, the eggs are laid indiscriminately and could be found in a variety of places including sea containers and ships.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Inflorescence/external feeding | ||
Plants/Inflorescence/frass visible | ||
Plants/Inflorescence/webbing | ||
Plants/Leaves/external feeding | ||
Plants/Leaves/frass visible | ||
Plants/Leaves/leaves rolled or folded | ||
Plants/Leaves/shredding | ||
Plants/Leaves/webbing | ||
Plants/Whole plant/frass visible | ||
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback |
Prevention and Control
Cultural Control
In the Russian Far East, ship and port lighting are known to attract females of Lymantria dispar, Lymantria monacha and L. mathura. Reducing light in port areas during times of female flight activity can reduce the risk of egg masses being deposited on sea containers, other cargo and ships. Shipping companies and port operations are co-operating with the Russian Plant Quarantine Agency to reduce lighting based on flight periodicity data (USDA Forest Service, 2001).
Biological Control
Aerial applications of the bacterial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis, have been applied to outbreak populations of L. mathura and L. dispar near the ports of Vostochny and Nakhodka, Russian Far East. Unfortunately these suppression efforts were not effective. Parasitoids known to attack L. mathura are potential candidates for classical biological control programmes, if this insect becomes established outside its geographic range.
Chemical Control
In China, infestations of both L. dispar and L. mathura have been controlled in chestnut orchards by the application of pesticides to tree trunks (Zheng et al., 1994).
Pheromonal Control
Based on coupled gas chromatography/electroantennogram detector responses and dose-response curves, the two compounds: (Z,Z,Z)-3,6,9-nonadecatriene and its monoepoxide, Z,Z-(9S,10R)-9,10-epoxy-3,6-nonadecadiene 4a, have been identified from abdominal tip extracts of L. mathura female moths. Only one of the monoepoxide enantiomers (S,R) was active, according to single cell recordings. In field tests in Russia, both the (S,R)-monoepoxide and the racemate were active (Oliver et al., 1999). Traps baited with these compounds could be used to 'trap-out' recently established populations of L. mathura.
Field Monitoring
Pheromone traps, baited with the attractant pheromone from L. mathura, can be used to determine the presence of populations in areas suspected of having recent introductions. Moreover, pheromone traps baited with the gypsy moth attractant, (+)-disparlure, are known to attract L. mathura males (Odell et al., 1992). Pheromone traps can also be used to establish adult flight periods near ports, within the insect's geographic range. In this way, night lighting may be lowered to reduce the risk of oviposition on shipping crates and other items destined for export (USDA Forest Service, 2001). Light traps have been used in the forest and port areas of the Russian Far East to monitor adult flight, but have so far proven to be ineffective for this purpose (USDA Forest Service, 2001).Field-sampling procedures to estimate L. mathura egg mass densities and predict defoliation, are being developed in the Russian Far East through a USDA Forest Service/Russian Federal Forest Service co-operative programme (USDA Forest Service, 2001).Aerial and ground surveys can be used to detect infestations of L. mathura within its geographic range and assess the magnitude of outbreaks.
Integrated Pest Management
Approaches to the integrated pest management of L. mathura are similar to the closely related forest defoliators, L. dispar and L. monacha. However, the monitoring and direct control tactics for this insect still require some refinement. Within its geographic range, monitoring efforts should concentrate on the early detection of infestations using pheromone traps. When refined, egg mass surveys could be used to predict defoliation and population trends, and determine the need for direct control. Applications of B. thuringiensis against this insect have so far provided unacceptable results, whereas the improved formulations and application techniques offer opportunities for a better performance by this bacterium. One of the major concerns with this insect is its potential to be introduced into new locations, become established and cause widespread damage, as L. dispar has. Therefore techniques designed to reduce this risk are key aspects of an integrated pest management system for L. mathura. Examples of viable pest management tactics include lowering the light intensity during adult flight periods at ports where this insect is native. This will reduce the hazard of egg mass deposition on ships and cargo. Also inspections for egg masses and other life stages on products destined for export should be carried out, pheromone traps should be used to monitor sites where there is a high risk of introduction and newly detected infestations should be promptly eradicated.
Impact
L. mathura is an important forest defoliator within its geographic range and is capable of feeding on the foliage and flowers of a wide range of hosts. In India and Bangladesh, L. mathura is considered to be one of the principal defoliators of the saltree, Shorea robusta. Outbreaks in Russia are not well documented but can be extensive. Sometimes they are concurrent with those of Lymantria dispar. Little is known about the subsequent effects of L. mathura defoliation in forests (Baranchikov et al., 1995; Zlotina et al., 1998). However, growth loss, branch die-back and some tree mortality can be expected after 2 years or more of successive defoliation. In India, outbreaks are infrequent but extensive when they do occur. No significant tree mortality occurs after the defoliation of S. robusta, but tree vigour may be reduced and the susceptibility to attack from other insect species may increase (Dey and Tiwari, 1997).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 10 December 2020
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.